CIM Briefing Papers |
||||||||||||||||||||||
C.I.M. Outline #8
ABORTION: A CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE
I. Introduction
A. The root of the abortion question is not whether or not
it is sociologically useful, that is granted, but
whether or not it is ethical to re-define human life.
B. The real issues behind this intensely emotional debate
which has so polarized our nation are: What is a human?
(How is man defined? or, How is human value
determined?), and when does human life begin?
C. The abortion issue is the issue it is because it involves
a primary collision of two differing worldviews:
Humanism versus Judeo-Christian theism. It arose because
of the loss of a Christian consensus in this country
which we had for almost 200 years.
II. How is Human Life and Value Determined, or What is Human?
A. Human Value is arbitrary or assigned.
1. Garrett Hardin, an eminent biologist says: "People
who worry about the moral danger of abortion do so
because they think of the fetus as a human being
and hence equate feticide with murder. Whether the
fetus is or is not a human being is a matter of
definition, not fact and we can define any way we
wish." (From the Journal of Marriage & Family)
2. Harvey Cox, a theologian, writes: "Secular man's
values have been deconsecrated, shorn of any claim
to ultimate or final significance... They are no
longer the direct expression of divine will. They
have become what certain people at a particular
time and place hold to be good. They have ceased
to be values and have become valuations..."
(Secular City, p. 3.)
3. Four examples of subjective valuation with regards
to man.
a. In the area of the physical--the setting forth
of some standard for the ideal physical
specimen.
(1) Francis Crick, Nobel prize-winning
biologist, advocates legislation under which
new born babies would not be considered
legally alive until they were two days old
and had been certified as healthy by medical
examiners.
(2) Philip Handler, a prominent scientist says:
"The time has come to exert a national
policy of eliminating defective unborn
babies. Not to do so, Handler warns, would
endanger the very stock of mankind and court
the dreadful prospect of serious damage to
the human gene pool.
b. Social Standards. Is he or she socially
useful? Do they or can they contribute
anything positive to society?
Hitler said "we must get rid of useless
eaters."
Our dwindling resources make this sound
attractive. Example: the retarded child who is
a financial burden.
c. Mental Awareness. Value is assigned according
to certain mental functions that are present.
(1) Winston L. Duke, a scientist says: "A
philosophy of reason will define a human
being as life which demonstrates self-
awareness, volition, and rationality. Thus
it should be recognized that not all men are
human..." ("The New Biology," Reason, Aug.
1972.)
(2) Ethicist Joseph Fletcher believes a person
is not human when there is absence of
cerebral function.
(3) A leading feminist as early as 1971 said:
"Fetuses aren't human beings. A human being
ought to have more brains than a puppy
dog."
d. Social interaction
Anthropologist, Ashley Montagu says: "A newborn
baby is not truly human until he or she is
molded by social and cultural influences
later."
4. Implications of Arbitrary Definitions of Human
Value
Ethicist Daniel Callahan said it clearly: "A power
group society could, by the use of this principle
(of defining humanness any way we wish), define the
chronically sick, the senile, the elderly as non-
human, and thus justify the taking of their lives
on the grounds of the social good to be obtained."
(Abortion: Law, Choice and Morality, p.125.)
B. Human Value is Inherent.
1. Man has value because he is created in God's Image.
This is known through Scripture.
a. Man is a spiritual being. Gen. 1:26; 2:7. God
breathed into his nostrils and he became a
living soul.
b. The Bible views the fetus as a human entity.
Life is seen as a continuum of conception to
death. Isa. 49:1-5; Job 10; Ps. 139.
c. The historical position of the church has always
been that Christ was divine from conception.
Matt. 1:20; Lk. 1:35.
d. The fetus is human with potential.
2. The Commandment not to murder (Exodus 20)
It refers to willful. premeditated, malicious
taking of a life.
Abortion and infanticide were common practice among
the nations surrounding Israel. The only
exceptions to this commandment were: legal
executions (Gen.9:6; Ex. 2:23; Lev. 24:15; Rom.
13:4.), killing aggressors in war, and self-
defense.
III. When Does Human Life Begin?
A. Biologists in the past have always concluded that it
began at conception. If it isn't human life, what kind
of life is it? We know it is not part of the mother.
B. Science has been inconsistent.
1. Scientists in England experimenting with live
aborted fetuses were opposed. Why, if the fetus
is not human?
2. In Vitro experimentation. Where do you decide
human life begins?
3. Several years ago a baby born to a 14 year old in
Connecticut was stuffed into plastic bag and put
in the trash. In court the issue was "Did the
baby breathe?" If it breathed it was human and
she could be tried for murder.
C. Francis Crick and Thomas Watson state that human life
should begin when a baby is "pronounced" alive.
D. The Supreme Court ruled that life begins with
"viability".
E. The Christian view is that life begins at conception.
It is then a developing human being. It is definitely
the safe view and historically the church has always
viewed feticide as murder. See the Didache, Clement of
Alexander, Athenagora, Tertullian, Council of Alvira
(A.D.305), Council of Ancyia (A.D.314), St. Basil, and
Thomas Aquinas.
IV. Conclusion.
The divisiveness of this issue of due to the different
worldview assumptions of the two sides. The Christian must
never allow the opposition's statement that the Pro-life
view is based on religious beliefs while the abortionist
view is based on reason and compassion. Their humanist
worldview assumptions are no less based on religious
beliefs. All worldviews are religious in that their
presuppositions or assumptions are held in faith.
Christian Information Ministries is a non-profit ministry and is
dependent on gifts from God's people in order to operate. If you
receive a benefit from our materials would you consider giving a
tax-deductible gift to CIM. We suggest $25. a year minimum.
Send to: Christian Information Ministries
2050 N. Collins Blvd. #100
Richardson, TX 75080
|
Do you want a printer friendly version of this paper?
Select your format below
|
|||||||||||||||||||||