CIM Briefing Papers |
||||||||||||||||||||||
C.I.M. Outline #18
THE CHRISTIAN AND ECOLOGY
I. Introduction
It has been stated that the root cause of the ecological
crisis is religious, and only a change in orientation will
bring about the needed changes.
Lynn White, a historian, said back in the '60s: "What we do
about ecology depends on our ideas of the man-nature
relationship. More science and more technology are not
going to get us out of the present ecological crisis until
we find a new religion or rethink our old one." (from: "The
Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis", SCIENCE. 155,
1967. p. 1203-1207).
Paul Sears said, ". . . hope for the healing of this
injured planet lies not in device but in design, not in
technique but in the realm of the intangibles--the values
and sanctions of our cultures. If ever the custodians of
religious faith have been challenged, they are challenged
today."
Ecology must be related to political and economic balances,
and these in turn are connected to the beliefs and values of
man. Therefore, ecology is a religious and philosophical
issue.
II. The Alleged Culprit of the Ecological Crisis
A. The Judeo-Christian Worldview
1. Tertullian, an early Church father of the 2nd
Century, said: "If the Tiber floods or the Nile
fails to flood, if the skies darken, if the earth
trembles, if famine, war or plague occurs, then
immediately the shout goes up: `The Christians to
the lions.'" (THE HORIZON HISTORY OFF
CHRISTIANITY, p. 89.
2. Arnold Toynbee, the historian said: ". . .when the
Greco-Roman world was converted to Christianity,
the divinity was drained out of nature and
concentrated in a single, transcendent God. Man's
greedy impulse to exploit nature used to be held
in check by his awe, his pious worship of nature.
Now monotheism, as enunciated in Genesis, has
removed the age-old restraint." ("The Religious
Background of the Present Environmental Crisis",
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 3,
1972, pp.141-146.)
3. Lynn White says, "Christianity, in absolute
contrast to ancient paganism and Asia's religions,
not only established a dualism of man and nature,
but also insisted that it is God's will that man
exploit nature for his proper ends." (SCIENCE,
155, 1967, pp. 1203-1207.)
White also says, "The crisis will not abate
until we reject the Christian axiom that
nature has no reason for existence save to
serve man." (Emphasis ours) (THE
ENVIRONMENTAL HANDBOOK, p. 25.)
He therefore, advocates a democracy of all
creatures.
B. An Analysis of the Charge
1. Christianity teaches a dualism of
Creator/Creation. Critics charge that since man
no longer see nature as divine, he feels free to
exploit it.
Answer: Christianity does teach that God is
transcendent (apart from nature) but not as in
Deism which teaches that God is in no way involved
in His creation. The balancing factor is
immanence. Historic Christianity has always
taught that while God transcends His creation, He
is also actively involved in conserving and
sustaining it (Col. 1:17). What better example is
there than His incarnation.
2. Christianity has a mandate from Scripture to
exploit nature. Genesis 1:28 . . ."be fruitful
and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it;
and rule over the fish of the sea and over the
birds of the sky, and over every living thing that
moves on the earth."
Answer: "Subdue" does not mean "exploit' but
rather has the sense of "do not allow it to get
the upper hand." Man's dominion, or sovereignty
over nature, brings with it a responsibility. Man
is to superintend what belongs to God.
C. Conclusion:
1. When the church historically emphasized God's
transcendence to an extreme, the church did not
contribute positively to social change.
2. When immanence was over-emphasized, it led to a
romanticizing of nature and pantheism (e.g. St.
Francis of Assisi and Albert Schweitzer).
3. Transcendence and immanence must always be held in
balance.
III. The Proposed Alternative
Those who believe Christianity is the enemy of the
environment want to replace it with the pantheistic
religions of the East and forms of animism. They
collectively seem to advocate a nature-centered religion.
Just such a religion was proposed by Aldous Huxley in his
last novel, ISLAND. Paul Erhlich says, "Before the
Christian era, trees springs, hills, streams, and other
objects of nature had guardian spirits. These spirits had
to be approached and placated before one could safely
invade their territory. As White says `by destroying
pagan animism, Christianity made it possible to exploit
nature in a mood of indifference to the feeling of natural
objects.'" (From THE ENVIRONMENTAL HANDBOOK.).
In the light of these proposals, the question must be
asked: Can adequate values for the ecological crisis be
derived from these monistic, pantheistic religions? We
think the answer is an overwhelming no! One only has to
look at Asian countries (India) to see that they have not
preserved the ecology. The reasons are as follows:
A. In a monistic worldview you have unity but no
diversity.
1. With monism all is of one essence. Without any
distinction (diversity) you cannot have right
and wrong, good or bad, or true moral values.
2. Alan Watts, the Hindu poet likens morality to a
stage where you see good and evil, but after the
show the good guys and the bad guys are friends.
3. Yun Men, a Bhuddist, says, "The conflict between
right and wrong is the sickness of the mind."
4. Charles Manson, the convicted killer, and
convert to eastern religions, rightly observed
that "if God is one, what is bad?"
Conclusion: Without diversity you would be in a
position of fighting God if you oppose injustice or
fight the abnormalities of nature since all is of
equal essence. This is exactly what Camus wrote of
in THE PLAGUE. Such a worldview leads directly to
the fatalism the East is famous for. Under this
system one could not logically deny that genocide
might be a valid answer to balance the ecological
cycle.
B. The East denies the reality of the material world.
1. This is the reason why the East has not
developed science and technology to the degree
the West has.
2. If the material world is an illusion what
grounds are there to distinguish fact from
fantasy? Law-Tse said: "If when I was asleep I
was a man dreaming I was a butterfly, how do I
know when I am awake I am not a butterfly
dreaming I am a man?"
3. The question remains unanswered. "If nature
isn't real why should it be deemed important?
C. The absence of a personal God de-personalizes man.
1. Eastern religions see personality as man's
ultimate problem, hence dissolution of self-hood
is its ultimate goal.
2. In eastern religions man disappears into the
woodwork and has no more dignity than the
animals, and in practice man ends up lower.
3. Conclusion: In the direction of the east there
is no exit!
IV. The Christian View of Nature (Biblically and Historically)
Main tenets:
A. The Christian God is personal and infinite in contrast
to the gods of the East and the Greco-Roman world.
B. The Christian God is both transcendent and immanent; He
is involved in his creation but not part of its
essence.
C. Nature bears witness of God (Ps. 19:1). Nature is not
antagonistic to God (Ps. 104:24). Matter is not evil.
God pronounced His creation "very good" (Genesis 1).
D. God is the owner of the natural world (Ps. 24:1); man
is the stewardor vice-regent (Gen. 1:26 ff.) Man was
created in God's image in order to rule. God gave man
dominion over the earth. This was not negated by the
fall (Gen. 9 and Ps. 8:6). The natural resources of
the earth are tools for man's dominion (Gen. 1:26ff.).
Man is not free to exploit nature. Genesis 2:15 says
man is to replenish the earth. We take this to mean
man is to be careful not to interfere with the
ecological cycles. He is to "superintend" it.
E. The Bible has much to say about ecology. The Hebrews
were to bury their waste (Deut. 23:13). Soil
conservation was to be practiced (Lev. 25:1-23). They
were to conserve trees (Deut. 20:19-20). They were to
rest animals (Ex. 23:12).
V. The True Culprit of the Ecological Crisis
It is man's heart that is polluted! God cared enough for
His creation to become part of it (the incarnation) in order
to redeem man. Christianity offers a real basis for morals
and a solution to the nature of man. Personal reconciliation
to God, the Creator, affects changes in the soul of man and
His relationship to nature.
Christian Information Ministries is a non-profit ministry and is
dependent on gifts from God's people in order to operate. If you
receive a benefit from our materials would you consider giving a
tax-deductible gift to CIM. We suggest $25. a year minimum.
Send to: Christian Information Ministries
2050 N. Collins Blvd. #100
Richardson, TX 75080
|
Do you want a printer friendly version of this paper?
Select your format below
|
|||||||||||||||||||||