CIM Briefing Papers

 
C.I.M. Outline #25

                   Christianity and the Future

I.   Introduction

     A.   In theology it is known as the study of Eschatology. 
          The study of "future " or "final" things.  How God will
          wrap-up, or conclude history.

     B.   Importance:

          1.   What we believe about the future determines in a
               large measure how we live in the here and now. 
               This is true both at the personal level and
               corporately, in that it affects how the church
               views its ministry in the world.

                "Since everything will be destroyed in this way,
                what kind of people ought you to be?  You ought
                to live holy and godly lives as you look forward
                to the day of God and speed its coming." (IIPet.
                3:11,12a).

          2.   That Christ will again return to earth is a
               fundamental of the faith.  To deny that Christ
               will one day return to earth is to be less than
               orthodox.  "I will come back..." Jn. 14:3.


II.  The Problem, or Crisis in Eschatology

        A.   It has been estimated that over one-half of the NT
             is about the future Kingdom, i.e., Christ's return. 
             Critics of the Bible in the previous century, and
             in the 20th, therefore say Christ's mission was a
             failure since his kingdom has not been realized in
             two thousand years of history.

        B.   Those who believe the Bible readily agree on the
             fact of Christ's return, but there has been no
             strong consensus in church history as to how the
             final days (or order of events) will come about.  

        C.   Among some Bible believers and sects there has been
             undue speculation and unsuccessful date-setting
             which has damaged the credibility of many and has
             harmed the reputation of the church as a whole. 
             Some current examples:

             1.   The book 88 REASONS WHY THE RAPTURE COULD 
                  OCCUR IN 1988.

             2.   Each Psalm contains hidden prophecy for that
                  particular year.  For example:  Psalm 90
                  contains hidden prophecy for events that will
                  occur in 1990, from Psalm 91, events for 1991,
                  etc. (J.R. Church)

             3.   God allowed the Hubble telescope to be flawed
                  because the New Jerusalem is now approaching
                  the earth and God did not want it to be
                  revealed at this time.

             4.   Equating the recent rise of Iraq with the
                  rebuilding of the city of Babylon which the
                  Bible says will never again be inhabited.  See
                  Jer. 50:39.

III.  Interpreting Prophecy

      A.   The liberal approach.  Because of its naturalistic
           bias, prophecy must be demythologized.  It holds to
           non-literal spiritual fulfillment.  Prophecy
           (apocalyptic literature) is studied as a form of
           ancient literature.

      B.   The evangelical approach.  Since they believe the
           Bible is a supernatural book, fore-telling the future
           is no problem.  The problem is interpretative.  What
           method of interpretation can I use to arrive at the
           meaning intended by the original authors? 

           1.   Some prerequisites:

                a.   Knowledge of the historical situation. 
                     What crisis or problem caused the writer to
                     pen this book?  This involves a great deal
                     of historical study of both internal, or
                     biblical sources, and external, or non
                     biblical sources.  Archaeology plays a key
                     role here.

                b.   Language requirements.  To be an accurate
                     interpreter one must know the original
                     languages and what the words meant at that
                     time, and in the context of the passage.

                c.   The symbolic language of prophetic passages
                     must be studied in the light of the Bible's
                     overall usage of the symbols.  Take the
                     symbol of leaven for example; it does not
                     always mean the same thing.  To be an
                     accurate interpreter, a significant grasp
                     of the Bible as a whole is necessary.  For
                     example, much of the symbolism in The
                     Revelation is borrowed from the books of
                     Ezekiel, Zechariah, and Daniel.

                d.   When studying prophecy it is helpful to
                     have a grasp of historical theology, that
                     is, what the great theologians of the
                     church have taught.  This is, of course,
                     not an infallible rule.  Even the great
                     ones have made errors, but it should make
                     us precede with caution when we oppose
                     them!

           2.   Why the differences?  Several plausible
                explanations:

                a.   Different levels of knowledge.  Let's face
                     it, some have a better grasp of the
                     original languages than others.  The same
                     goes for the historical situation, etc.

                b.   Theological bias has a great deal to do
                     with the interpretative scheme we use.

                c.   World events and the cultural climate often
                     influence our interpretation of Scripture. 
                     For example:  Augustine saw Christianity
                     become the official religion of the Roman
                     empire.  He naturally thought Christ would
                     return at the end of the millennium. 
                     During WWII many saw Hitler as the
                     Antichrist because of his persecution of
                     the Jews.

IV.  Three Main Interpretive Schemes for Interpreting Prophecy

     A.   They are based upon how they answer the following
          questions:

          1.   What is the nature of the kingdom?

          2.   Will the Church be successful in evangelizing the
               world?

          3.   How does Israel and the Church relate to each
               other in God's overall plan?

          4.   Will Israel be revived as a nation to receive all
               the promises made to David?

          5.   Will there be a literal 1000 year reign of Christ
               on earth as revealed in Rev. 20:6?

     B.   Three views of the Future:

          1.   Postmillennialism:  Christ will come after the
               millennium or Golden Age.  The millennium is
               generally not seen as a literal 1000 year period. 
               One form holds that the present church age will
               culminate in the entire world becoming
               "Christianized."  When this occurs a golden age
               will commence for 1000 years (or longer) after
               which Christ will come.  This view tends to be
               very optimistic about the mission of the Church
               ("the gates of hell will not prevail..." Matt.
               16:18).  Many of the great hymns of the church
               have a very strong postmillennial flavor.

          2.   Premillennialism:  Christ will return to earth and
               establish a literal 1000 year kingdom on earth.  A
               literal nation of Israel will be prominent among
               the nations.  (See Rom 11).


          3.   Amillennialism:  There is no literally 1000 year
               kingdom followed by Christ's return, only the last
               judgement followed by the eternal state which
               begins after Christ returns to judge the earth. 
               One variation of this view holds that the eternal
               state is a literal kingdom on earth, the New
               Earth, that is.

V.   Some Perspectives on the Study of Eschatology

     A.   The purpose of Prophecy in Scripture is not to simply
          satisfy our curiosity about future things, but to
          motivate individual Christians to holy living and for
          the Church to keep a proper focus on its task in the
          present world.

     B.   The doctrine of eschatology should be one of the last
          things new believers try to master.

     C.   Except for the belief that Christ will return again to
          the earth in bodily form, various schemes of the last
          days should not be held with a rigid dogmatism, nor
          should they be a point of fellowship.  In otherwords,
          how we interpret the beast in Rev. 13 should not be the
          grounds for determining with whom we fellowship.  The
          grounds of fellowship are given in IIJohn.

     D.   We must be careful not to interpret prophecy in light
          of current events, which some call "newspaper
          exegesis".

     E.   Rather we must be assiduous students of the Word,
          always laboring to find the author's original intent as
          it was meant for its original readers.

     F.   Never hold views concerning the Last Days in such a
          rigid manner that we are not willing to listen to new
          ideas or be open to new discoveries from scholarly
          research.  Occasionally, read a prophetic book of the
          Bible (like Revelation) as though you have never read
          it before.

     G.   Be careful not to romanticize the modern state of
          Israel.  Rabbinical Judaism is a false cult and not a
          valid way to God.  This view does not make one anti-
          semitic.  Old Testament Judaism, while true does not go
          far enough.  The New Covenant announced in Jer. 32-33
          is now in affect.

     H.   As much as possible, attempt to be aware of modern
          biblical studies which challenge us to re-think old and
          cherished prophetic interpretations. For example:

          1.   New studies indicate that there are strong
               arguments that all the books of the New Testament
               were written before 70 A.D. including the book of
               Revelation.  This makes a great deal of difference
               as to how the message related to the original
               readers.

          2.   New studies from the Dead Sea Scroll material is
               shedding much new light on the theological beliefs
               in Palestine in the early First Century.  For
               example, scholars believe the writer of the book
               of Revelation was familiar with the non-canonical
               book of Enoch, which is a book of similar genre. 
               Jude, the half-brother of Jesus quotes from two of
               these books, including this book of Enoch.  See
               Jude 4, and 9.

          3.   We need to re-think the importance of Christ's
               curse on the nation of Israel in Matthew 23, and
               the events which He prophesied in Matt. 24. 
               Perhaps the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. plays a
               more significant role than we think in such NT
               phrases like "the last Days" and why the warnings
               in Hebrews were so urgent to the original readers.

     I.   Whatever we believe about prophecy it must never become
          a means of escapism to the extent that it keeps us from
          the task God has called us to do.  We are to be "salt"
          and "light" in the world.  Salt in the shaker does no
          good whatsoever, nor does light under bushel remove
          darkness.

Provocative New Books on the Subject of Eschatology:

Balyeat, Joseph R.  BABYLON:  THE GREAT CITY OF REVELATION.
Blaising, Craig A. and Bock, Darrell L. editors.  
      DISPENSATIONALISM, ISRAEL AND THE CHURCH.
Clouse, Robert G. ed.  THE MEANING OF THE MILLENNIUM:  FOUR 
      VIEWS.
Crenshaw, Curtis I. and Gunn, Grover E.  III.  DISPENSATIONALISM: 
      TODAY, YESTERDAY, AND TOMORROW.
Davis, John Jefferson.  CHRIST'S VICTORIOUS KINGDOM: 
      POSTMILLENNIALISM RECONSIDERED.
DeMar, Gary.  LAST DAYS MADNESS.
Gentry, Kenneth L. Jr.  BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL:  DATING THE BOOK 
      OF REVELATION.
Gentry, Kenneth L. Jr.  THE BEAST OF REVELATION.
Grenz, Stanley J.  THE MILLENNIAL MAZE.
Hoekema, Anthony A.  THE BIBLE AND THE FUTURE.
LaRondell, Hans K.  THE ISRAEL OF GOD IN PROPHECY.
Travis, Stephen H.  CHRISTIAN HOPE & THE FUTURE.
 
 
Christian Information Ministries is a non-profit ministry and is 
dependent on gifts from God's people in order to operate.  If you 
receive a benefit from our materials would you consider giving a 
tax-deductible gift to CIM.  We suggest $25. a year minimum.  
Send to:  Christian Information Ministries 
          2050 N. Collins Blvd. #100 
          Richardson, TX  75080 

Top of Page

RAPID RESPONSE
REPORT
BRIEFING PAPERS
BIBLIOGRAPHIES
MOVIE & BOOK
REVIEWS
TECHNICAL PAPERS
ARARAT REPORTS
   
CONTACT US
OUR STAFF
CIM HOME

Do you want a printer friendly version of this paper?

Select your format below