CIM Briefing Papers |
||||||||||||||||||||||
C.I.M. Outline #1
THE RESURRECTION: FACT OR FICTION
I. INTRODUCTION
A. The resurrection is the falsification point of
Christianity. The keystone in the arch. (I Cor. 15:14).
B. Christ predicted His resurrection 8 times (Matt. 16:21;
17:9; 17:22-23; 20:18,19; 25:32; Mark 9:10; Luke 9:22-
27; John 2:18-22).
C. The resurrection, if it really occurred in space-time
history, would authenticate His claim of deity.
D. It would seem that for an event in antiquity, the
resurrection has superior sources:
1. We have six Biblical sources (five different
reporters), Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, and I
Corinthians.
2. The aforementioned books were in circulation, for
the most part, by the end of the First Century A.D.
Recently some scholars are moving them back even
closer to the event.
3. There are many extra-biblical sources that mention
the resurrection of Jesus. One ossuary (an ancient
epitaph) mentions the resurrection only 18 years
after Jesus' death.
II. THE EVIDENCE FOR THE RESURRECTION
A. The Empty Tomb
1. Both the followers of Jesus and His enemies agree
the tomb was empty.
2. There are extra-biblical references to it.
3. The Sermon on the resurrection preached by Peter
in Acts 3:28 was given only a 20 minute walk from
the tomb. His message and response would be hard
to explain without it if the body were still there.
4. Attempts to explain away the empty tomb:
a. The body was stolen
(1) By the Disciples (Matt. 28:14-15)
Objections:
(a) How did the soldiers know it was the
disciples if they were sleeping?
(b) Soldiers who allowed a prisoner to
escape were executed.
(c) Hypocrites are not martyrs.
(2) By the Jewish authorities
Objection: If so, they could have produced
the body to counter the preaching in
Jerusalem.
b. The Swoon Theory
Originated by Venturinni around 1700 and made
popular today by Hugh Schonfield in his book THE
PASSOVER PLOT.
(1) Original version: Jesus was not really dead
but revived in the cool tomb.
(2) Today's version: Jesus plotted His own death
and a cohort gave Him a drug on the cross that
caused Him to appear dead. He hadn't counted
on the spear wound.
Objections: In order to accept this you have
to believe that:
(a) He freed Himself from the grave clothes.
(b) He pushed the stone away.
(c) Sneaked past the sleeping soldiers.
(d) Walked to Galilee and convinced his
disciples that He had arisen from the dead.
c. The Wrong Tomb Theory
The women went to the wrong tomb.
Objections: (1) It assumes that Peter did too.
(2) Why didn't the authorities just
point this out?
d. A Case of Mistaken Identity
Mary Magdalene mistook the gardener for Jesus. Or,
it was a disciple who looked like Jesus, or His
identical twin.
Objections: same as above.
e. Hallucinations
Objection: None of the right psychological
conditions were present. Difficult to explain his
appearing to 500 at once (I Cor. 15)!
f. It became a Legend
Objections: (1) Gospels were written too early.
(2)He appeared to women first.
B. The Behavior of the Disciples
1. It is hard to explain Peter's sermon in the light of
the previous denials that he was a follower of Jesus
the night of the crucifixion.
2. It is hard to explain the behavior and martyrdom of
the disciples if they had a knowledge of the truth.
Note how they died according to tradition:
Stephen-stoned, James-beheaded, Philip-crucified,
Matthew-sword, Mark-dragged through the streets and
burned, James the Less-beaten and stoned, Matthias-
stoned and beheaded, Andrew-crucified, Peter-
scourged and crucified upside down, Paul-beheaded,
Thaddeus-crucified, Bartholomew-beaten to death,
Thomas-speared, Simon the Zealot-crucified, John-
sentenced to be boiled in oil but later died a
natural death.
C. His Appearances
In order they are: To Mary M., a party of women, two
men on the Emmaus road, Peter, to ten disciples in the
upper room, one week later to eleven disciples, to seven
disciples in Galilee, to 500 people at once, to James,
to the disciples in Jerusalem, to Stephen, to Saul.
D. The existence of the church.
E. Day of worship shifted to Sunday.
F. The experience of Christians over 2000 years of history.
III. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESURRECTION
It means the Father accepted the Son's offering for sin.
It was proof of His deity. We have hope of redemption.
FOR FURTHER STUDY:
Chapman, Colin. The Case for Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI.:
Wm. B. Erdmans Publishing Co.,1981.Pp.278-290.
Chapman, Colin. Christianity on Trial. Wheaton, IL.: Tyndale,
1975.
Craig, William Lane. The Son Rises. Chicago: Moody Press,
1981.
Geisler, Norman L. Miracles and Modern Thought. Grand Rapids,
MI.: Zondervan, 1982.
Green, Michael. Runaway World. Downers Grove, IL.:
InterVarsity Press, 1968.
Green, Michael. Man Alive!. Downers Grove, IL.: InterVarsity
Press, 1967.
Habermas, Gary. The Resurrection: An Apologetic. Grand Rapids,
MI.: Baker, 19
Miethe, Terry L. Did Jesus Rise From the Dead? San Francisco,
CA.: Harper & Row, 1987.
Morrison, Frank. Who Moved the Stone? Grand Rapids, MI.:
Zondervan, n.d.
Christian Information Ministries is a non-profit ministry and is
dependent on gifts from God's people in order to operate. If you
receive a benefit from our materials would you consider giving a
tax-deductible gift to CIM. We suggest $25. a year minimum.
Send to: Christian Information Ministries
2050 N. Collins Blvd. #100
Richardson, TX 75080
|
Do you want a printer friendly version of this paper?
Select your format below
|
|||||||||||||||||||||