RAPID RESPONSE REPORT

 

DEFENDING HISTORIC CHRISTIANITY IN A POSTMODERN WORLD

 

8/21/2000  #2

 

Editor: Bill Crouse

 

In our premier issue we brought to your attention an article on the unabomber (Ted Kaczynski) in ATLANTIC MONTHLYWe hope you got a chance to read it by now.  I'm still thinking about it, and am amazed at the how candid and intellectually honest the author was about the philosophical changes (the rejection of modernism) that were taking place at Harvard in the late 50's.  While many professors are still cautious about promoting the unabomber's violent modus operandi some are quietly making his essay on the evil of technology required reading for many of their courses.

 

First Note:  Deconstructing Archaeology?

 

My wife recently attended a seminar for science teachers in San Antonio.  One of the seminar leaders, a teacher in a prestigious north Dallas private school, made the comment that there are four words that are verboten in his classes.  Two of these words are: truth and fact!  This is exactly as we would expect an honest postmodernist to respond.  But think for a minute; this is a science teacher saying this.  He was not teaching philosophy or literature.  For some time now we have been pondering how PM would affect the science disciplines.  Consequently, we have been accumulating large files on ideologically driven science.  This is currently one of the hottest issues in philosophy of science, and has been ever since Thomas Kuhn published his STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS in 1962.  Remember, for a PM, all of life is a text;  there are only subjective interpretations, and all actions are political.  Is it any wonder then that there is such a growing distrust of science, or so many contradictory pronouncements (e.g., global warming etc.).  Is this deconstruction now occurring in Biblical archaeology?  It would appear so.  In the Mar/April issue of BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY TODAY (http://www.bib-arch.org/barma00/search.html) an article appeared which has provoked so much controversy THE NEW YORK TIMES was prompted to report on it.  The TIMES article: "The Bible, as History, Flunks New Archaeological Tests." (http://www10.nytimes.com:80/library/arts/072900david-bible.html

 

I think I am safe in assuming that most of our readers are under the impression that the science of archaeology has done nothing but largely substantiate the historicity of the Bible.  The thrust of this article (and several new books) is that the previous generation of archaeologists skewed their results because they were laboring to prove the Bible's historical accuracy.  One of these "biblical minimalists" as they are being called, writes that the biblical accounts of early Israel were purely theological (Philip Davies).  As I endlessly interpret and deconstruct Davies' statement, I can't help but conclude that he is being most PM.  "Words are tools of tyranny, and the authors wrote what they did to get people to act in a certain way."  As you might expect in Nationalistic Israel, this deconstruction of Israel's history has created quite a firestorm.

 

In these pages we will often be critical of PM.  However, there are times when they are right, and Christians need to take heed.  In the above Paragraph, the Biblical minimalists have a good criticism about those who use archaeology to prove the Bible.  Belief in the Bible's trustworthiness must not prejudice our conclusions or prevent us from looking at the data as unbiased as we possibly can.  In other words, the Christian archaeologist must look at the data and ask:  "Given my predisposition for the historicity of the Bible, am I forcing my conclusions in any way?"  Intellectually honesty must be one of the highest values of any Christian researcher.

 

To the credit of the editors of BAR in this controversy, in the July/August issue, they present the other side with an article by Alan Millard: "How Reliable is Exodus?" ( http://www.bib-arch.org/barja00/exodus1.html ).  In the same issue they included a review of James Hoffmeier's book ISRAEL IN EGYPT (http://www.bib-arch.org/barja00/reviews.html ).  The reviewer of the latter is not all that favorable to Hoffmeier's book, but it seems some of the criticisms might be legitimate.  Hoffmeier, a professor at Wheaton College, I'm sure is held accountable by the reviewer as one of those who are trying to prove the Bible.

 

Second Note:   REINVENTING YOURSELF

 

It's that time again when politicians, based on focus group studies, are busy reinventing themselves.  According to Gene Edward Veith, one of our favorite commentators on postmodern themes, to reinvent oneself is very PM.   He says, "Identity-shifting has become a hallmark of postmodern culture.  If truth is relative, who you are as a person is also relative.  If there are no essential realities, there is no essential self either."  Veith also quotes psychologist (actually, I think he is a psychiatrist) Robert Jay Lifton:   "Those who are dysfunctional are those who are inflexible and dogmatic, committed to a particular belief system and letting it run their lives."  Lifton makes it clear that he is referring to Christians.  You can find the article at:  http://www.worldmag.com/world/issue/09-04-99/cultural_3.asp

 

His first example of someone reinventing himself is not Al Gore!  Surprise, it's Garth Brooks.  He does believe, however, as many others do, that the Clinton's are the quintessential postmoderns and excellent examples of shifting identities.

 

Other Interesting Articles:

 

Politically Correct Archaeology!    http://www.foxnews.com/science/081700/israel.sml

 

Interesting book review by Phillip Johhson.  In Plato's Cave, by Alvin Kernan.  Book depicts the life of an academic modernist in a postmodern world.  http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0006/reviews/johnson.html

Commentary by Shelby Steele in the Wall Street Journal.  "A New Front in the Cultural War."  Article is about George W. Bush.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=45000023

 

For Christ and His Kingdom

 

cim@fni.com

 

www.fni.com/cim